ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
How the New Interacts With the Old? Hippocampal Processing During Memory Encoding of Creative Associations With Remote or Close Inherent Semantic Relatedness.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Creativity means the formation of novel and useful associations. Meanwhile, the role of the hippocampus in episodic memory and some forms of creative thinking has been identified, but it remains unclear how the hippocampus participates in the formation of memory for creative associations. In particular, considering creative associations are often formed on the basis of old ones, it is important to identify how the hippocampus and its associated neural network represent the interactions between the new and old associations during the encoding of creative associations. Thus, using the subsequent memory effect (SME) paradigm, the present study asked participants to learn a set of creative combinations (a common object paired with a creative alternate use, for example, basketball-buoy, which means a basketball is used as a buoy) during fMRI scanning. Moreover, we also quantified the degree of pre-existing semantic connections individually according to subjective ratings of inherent semantic relatedness between the objects and their alternate uses in the relatedness judgment task, resulting in a 2 (memory: remembered vs. forgotten) by 2 (semantic relatedness: remote vs. close) factorial design. Multivariate analysis revealed higher inter-item hippocampal pattern similarity for remembered relative to forgotten trials in both close relatedness and remote relatedness conditions, indicating that hippocampal representations become less separable supporting successful memory for creative associations. However, univariate analyses of the hippocampus and its neural network showed that enhanced hippocampal activation was associated with successful encoding in the remote relatedness but not close relatedness condition, whereas increased hippocampal functional connectivity with prefrontal and parietal cortices contributed to successful memory in the close relatedness but not remote relatedness condition. These observations suggest that hippocampal-dependent processes and distributed hippocampal network patterns selectively support successful memory for creative associations with either remote or close inherent semantic relatedness, which implies the interactions between pre-existing semantic connections and newly formed creative associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.