ReviewPest management science2026
Has the Striga problem been solved? A field perspective critique of recent progress.
Review in Pest management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three root-parasitic witchweed (Striga) species can cause up to total loss of grain and legume crops for millions of farmers in Africa. The damage is initiated before Striga emerges from the soil. Four decades of resistance breeding, especially maize, have at best conferred localized moderate resistance that has not greatly increased yields. Recent innovative basic research has led to major advances that are herein evaluated in biocontrol, formulating suicidal germination stimulants and gene-edited crops. A mycoherbicide was able to become a commercial success because the innovators rendered the fungus hypervirulent, inexpensively cultivated it, formulated it as a seedcoat with ample nutrition for extensive growth, and determined target species specificity for regulators. A slow-release formulation of suicidal germination stimulants led to a Striga-free crop, but crop planting had to be impractically delayed by almost 3 months for the technology to work. Elegant basic research led to gene-edited crop plants secreting vastly reduced levels of Striga germination stimulant, leading to Striga asiatica-free fields under low seeding levels of the parasite. It is doubted that the results will carry over to fields infested with the far more virulent Striga hermonthica having seedbanks so large that the residual amount of stimulant emitted may result in heavy infestation. The editing approach should be extended to suppressing the genes responsible for Striga attachment and establishment, and the genes stacked for more robust resistance. Solving only the Striga problem is insufficient because farmers with Striga are also confronted with insect, pathogen and climate constraints that need simultaneous solutions. © 2025 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.