ArticleClinical and translational science2025
AI-Driven Variant Annotation for Precision Oncology in Breast Cancer.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-powered liquid biopsy in cancer: a paradigm shift in cancer detection and personalized care.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- AI-Driven Variant Annotation for Precision Oncology in Breast Cancer.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interpreting the functional impact of genomic variants remains a major challenge in precision oncology, particularly in breast cancer, where many variants of unknown significance lack clear therapeutic guidance. Current annotation strategies focus on frequent driver mutations, leaving rare or understudied variants unclassified and clinically uninformative. Here, we present an Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)-driven framework that systematically identifies variants associated with key breast cancer phenotypes, including ESR1 and EZH2 activity, by integrating genomic, transcriptomic, structural, and drug response data. Using CCLE/DepMap and TCGA datasets, we analyzed > 12,000 variants across breast cancer genomes, identifying structurally clustered mutations that share functional consequences with well-characterized oncogenic drivers. This approach reveals that mutations in PIK3CA, TP53, and other genes strongly associate with ESR1 signaling, challenging conventional assumptions about endocrine therapy response. Additionally, EZH2-associated variants emerge in unexpected genomic contexts, suggesting new targets for epigenetic therapies. By shifting from frequency-based to structure-informed classification, we expand the set of potentially actionable mutations, enabling improved patient stratification and drug repurposing strategies. This work provides a scalable, clinically relevant method to accelerate variant annotation, offering new insights into drug sensitivity and resistance mechanisms. Future validation efforts will refine these predictions and integrate clinical outcomes to guide personalized treatment strategies. Our findings highlight the transformative potential of AI/ML in redefining cancer variant interpretation, bridging the gap between genomics, functional biology, and precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.