ArticleObesity pillars2025
Establishing a multidisciplinary bariatric arterial embolization program: A two-year clinical experience.
Article in Obesity pillars, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bariatric arterial embolization (BAE) is an emerging, minimally invasive, image-guided procedure for treating obesity in patients for whom nonoperative treatments have failed and metabolic-bariatric surgery is not an option. BAE has shown success in clinical studies, but guidance on integrating BAE into weight management programs (WMPs) is lacking. We describe our experience with building a multidisciplinary clinical program that integrates BAE into routine care for obesity. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center observational case series of patients treated with BAE through our WMP between November 2021 and September 2023. Patient chart review was performed for the following criteria for consideration of BAE: had a body mass index ≥30 kg/m Results: Thirty-one patients were considered for BAE through the program. Of those, 9 patients were cleared for BAE and 5 patients (4 women and 1 man) eventually underwent BAE. The mean age of the embolized patients was 42 years (range: 28-56). The mean pre-procedure weight was 116 kg (range: 100-134). Patients achieved a mean total body weight loss of 7.0% at 4-5 months' follow-up and 4.2% at 12 months. BAE was performed successfully with only transient nausea and vomiting postoperatively. The mean cost for BAE was $14,329 US dollars. Conclusions: BAE offers an obesity treatment option with low complication risk and potential benefit when used as part of a comprehensive WMP. Close collaboration between interventional radiologists and obesity medicine physicians is key for success. BAE should be offered as a component within a comprehensive WMP rather than as a stand-alone procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.