Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41127827›Full record

ReviewAPL bioengineering2025

Skin-on-chip: Quo vadis?

Mina Ghiță-Răileanu, Bianca-Maria Tihăuan, Irina-Oana Lixandru-Petre, Georgeta-Luminița Gheorghiu, Gratiela Gradisteanu Pircalabioru, Gabriela Cioca, Florina S Iliescu, Ciprian Iliescu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in APL bioengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Georgeta-Luminița GheorghiueBio-hub Centre of Excellence in Bioengineering, National University for Science and Technology, Politehnica Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2990-4534
Gratiela Gradisteanu PircalabioruORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6384-1822
Gabriela CiocaLucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1165-1389

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a need for reconstructing the structural and functional complexity of human tissues such as skin to replace the animal models and provide accurate knowledge while solving ethical challenges in human medicine. Lately, microfluidics and tissue engineering have significantly advanced the development of 3D cell cultures and skin-on-chip (SoC), thus offering a cost-effective alternative to the generally used preclinical drug screening, toxicology applications, and cosmetic testing models. The current work presents a critical view on the SoC, from the fundamental concepts to the fabrication, applications, and commercialization. It comprehensively discusses the challenges faced by the 3D skin models and the perspectives of microphysiological skin platforms for preclinical pharmaceuticals and cosmeceuticals screening and disease research. It also highlights the technical and ethical requirements for successful SoC as physiological and pathological models applicable to personalized medicine. The SoC clinical and commercial translation depends on developing convergent biomanufacturing strategies and infrastructure focused on applications such as personalized skin disease models, skin grafts, and drug or cosmetics screening platforms.

Identifiers

PMID41127827
PMCPMC12539882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.