ReviewAPL bioengineering2025
Skin-on-chip: Quo vadis?
Review in APL bioengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current and emerging new approach & methodologies for skin hazard assessment.Toxicological research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a need for reconstructing the structural and functional complexity of human tissues such as skin to replace the animal models and provide accurate knowledge while solving ethical challenges in human medicine. Lately, microfluidics and tissue engineering have significantly advanced the development of 3D cell cultures and skin-on-chip (SoC), thus offering a cost-effective alternative to the generally used preclinical drug screening, toxicology applications, and cosmetic testing models. The current work presents a critical view on the SoC, from the fundamental concepts to the fabrication, applications, and commercialization. It comprehensively discusses the challenges faced by the 3D skin models and the perspectives of microphysiological skin platforms for preclinical pharmaceuticals and cosmeceuticals screening and disease research. It also highlights the technical and ethical requirements for successful SoC as physiological and pathological models applicable to personalized medicine. The SoC clinical and commercial translation depends on developing convergent biomanufacturing strategies and infrastructure focused on applications such as personalized skin disease models, skin grafts, and drug or cosmetics screening platforms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.