ArticleMethodsX2025
Experimental and experiential recommendations for using the GreenFeed systems to measure gas flux in grazing and confined cattle.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term GreenFeed monitoring of enteric methane emissions in lactating buffaloes.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Estimation of the sample size to determine gas flux in finishing steers under confined conditions using alternative statistical approaches.Translational animal science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improving ruminant production efficiency is contingent on accurately measuring gas fluxes from individual animals in grazing and confined feeding environments The GreenFeed system (GFS) has been increasingly utilized by researchers to measure gas flux of ruminants in their production environment. However, there are wide inconsistencies in methodologies from laboratory-to-laboratory. The objective of this manuscript is to provide standardized recommendations for measuring individual animal gas fluxes of methane, carbon dioxide, oxygen, and hydrogen by the GFS, which are based on experiential and experimental evidence. The method includes:•GFS management: Setup, maintenance, and calibration of sensors•Animal Recommendations: Number of animals to sample, training on use of the system, and bait feeds - including type, composition, and mass. Further, we address operational considerations of using the GFS in extensive grazing environments and confined feeding operations.•Data recommendations: pre-processing data, data cleaning, handling outliers, approaches for estimating individual animal gas fluxes, and uses of application performance interfaces in conjunction with R for statistical analyses.Increasing standardization in GFS management across experiments and laboratory groups is greatly needed. We hope that these recommendations based on our collective experience and experimental evidence will aid in the standardization of GFS methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.