ReviewRoyal Society open science2025
Voice gender diversity: expression, perception and acoustics.
Review in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The voice is a key marker of gender identity, yet gender non-conforming speakers often diverge from binary vocal norms. This review synthesizes findings from 45 studies published between January 2020 and January 2025 examining how gender is expressed and perceived for the voices of gender-diverse individuals. We report how gender identities and expressions are measured, how gender-diverse voices are perceived, and how acoustic features relate to both self-reported and perceived gender. While binary frameworks still influence the experimental methods used, a shift towards more inclusive models is emerging. Gender-diverse voices are frequently externally perceived or acoustically represented as falling between binary categories or as misaligned with affirmed gender identity. Similar to binary voice gender, fundamental frequency and formants are key components of expressed and perceived gender. However, these findings may be biased owing to the binary understanding of gender in the methods used, a general focus on transfeminine voices, and few investigations on the impact of listeners' identity. A few studies reported that gender non-conforming listeners tend to have a distinct understanding of voice gender compared with cisgender listeners. To move forward, future research should adopt inclusive perceptual tasks, account for listener demographics, and further explore self-perception of voice gender.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.