ArticleCureus2025
Perceptions of Undergraduate Medical Students on Group Effectiveness in Problem-Based Learning (PBL) at Qassim University.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Problem-based learning promotes causal physiological reasoning in first-year medical students before formal cardiovascular instruction.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Group effectiveness in problem-based learning (PBL) plays a vital role in achieving learning outcomes; however, limited research has examined how students perceive this effectiveness, particularly in the Saudi educational context. This study aimed to explore undergraduate medical students' perceptions of group effectiveness in PBL. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among medical students using a validated questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze frequency and mean responses. Inferential analyses, including ANOVA and Tukey's honestly significant difference post hoc tests, were performed to examine the impact of gender and academic level on perceptions. Results The majority of students reported positive perceptions of group effectiveness. Within the process construct, 125 (58.7%) preferred group learning over working alone, although concerns about time efficiency were noted. Within the content construct, 166 (77.7%) of students agreed that group work enhanced tolerance, collaboration, and peer learning. ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences by gender and academic level in both constructs (p < 0.05), with third-year students reporting more favorable perceptions than first-year students. Conclusions Students generally perceived PBL group work as effective, particularly in fostering collaborative skills, tolerance, and peer learning. However, concerns about time investment and participation dynamics remain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.