ReviewCureus2025
Effectiveness of Dry Needling Combined With Exercise Versus Exercise Alone in Various Tendinopathies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of dry needling combined with exercise therapy versus exercise alone for pain and functional outcomes in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2026Article
- Calcific Patellar Tendinopathy. A Case Report Integrating Diagnostic Ultrasound Throughout a Multi-Modal Treatment Approach.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of dry needling combined with exercise compared with exercise alone for pain and functional outcomes in tendinopathies. A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar was conducted from inception to August 13, 2025, for randomized controlled trials involving adults with clinically confirmed tendinopathy. Eligible studies compared dry needling plus exercise with exercise alone and reported pain or functional outcomes. Four trials with 255 patients were included, covering lateral epicondylitis (two trials), patellar tendinopathy (one trial), and rotator cuff tendinopathy (one trial). Pooled analysis showed that dry needling combined with exercise reduced pain more than exercise alone (mean difference (MD) = -2.14; 95% CI, -3.50 to -0.78), although heterogeneity was substantial (I² = 95%). Immediate-term pain reduction was modest (MD = -0.44; 95% CI, -0.87 to 0.00), with larger but variable effects at mid- and long-term follow-ups. Functional outcomes favored the combined intervention, particularly for Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation scores at 3-4 weeks (MD = -5.24; 95% CI, -6.89 to -3.60; I² = 21%). Risk of bias was low in one trial and raised some concerns in three, mainly due to blinding and outcome assessment limitations. Overall, dry needling combined with exercise appears to provide greater pain relief and functional improvement than exercise alone, especially in the short to long term. However, substantial heterogeneity and methodological concerns highlight the need for further high-quality randomized controlled trials to confirm these findings and establish optimal treatment protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.