ArticleCureus2025
Learning Mass Casualty Triage via Role-Play Simulation.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The purpose of this educational intervention was to introduce trainees to the core competencies of disaster preparedness/resource allocation/mass casualty incident (MCI) command and event medicine. This innovative learning activity involving trainees from different programs teaches effective techniques of how to apply triage algorithms, such as Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START), in a mass casualty event. Educational objectives After participation in this educational session, learners were expected to be able to define a mass casualty incident (MCI) and discuss the unique challenges inherent to mass casualty incidents and disaster/event medicine, differentiate between day-to-day triage and triage during a mass casualty incident, and apply the components of Simple Triage and Rapid Transport (START) for mass casualty incidents. Curricular design The scenario was a music festival. A group of residents were granted backstage access to tour the concert grounds and medical tent. During the facility tour, the operations director (Proctor #2) radios the tour guide (Proctor #1) to let them know of an emergency crowd stampede due to unapproved pyrotechnics causing a fire; the medical tent suddenly became flooded with patients. "Patients" were trainees who received a laminated card labeled with vital signs and mental status and were transported one at a time to the tent. Residents ran over to the tent, performed triage, and then selected two of the most critical patients for air transport. The station leader documented the accuracy of each team. Winners were selected based on time of completion and accuracy of correctly triaging patients. For every incorrect triage, a 30-second penalty was added. Incorrectly triaged patient cards were debriefed in detail. Impact/effectiveness This activity engages learners both physically and mentally, necessitating everyone to be active. The impact was measured by a post-activity survey, accessed via QR at the station. Of the participants, 93% reported feeling better prepared to manage a real-life MCI. Further, 98% reported that START triage better motivated them to learn. In addition, 96% reported that this activity challenged them more than other learning activities. Verbal feedback included appreciation for the innovative activity design and being able to get some exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.