ArticleCureus2025
Validation of Urban Parks for Physical Activity Enhancement in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Developing Country Experience.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Built-environment guidance rarely translates into practice-ready walking prescriptions for older adults. In light of this, we calibrated graded, cadence-based urban park trails to generate target intensities and expected physiological responses to inform primary care and municipal signage. Methods Community-dwelling adults aged ≥60 years completed three predefined trails (low-, medium-, and high-intensity). Oxygen uptake (VO₂), minute ventilation (VE), and heart rate (HR) were recorded with a portable metabolic system and an optical HR sensor; cadence was metronome-guided to reach target intensities. Outcomes included VO₂, VE, HR, energy expenditure per ~12-15-minute bout, and perceived exertion. Results Physiological responses exhibited a graded, dose-responsive profile across trails. Mean VO₂, VE, HR, and energy expenditure increased from low to high, while walking time remained feasible for a brief bout. We provide practice-ready parameters (distance and cadence bands with expected intensity ranges) for implementation. No adverse events occurred. Conclusions Calibrated park trails can operationalize safe, scalable walking prescriptions for older adults. These translational outputs (distance and cadence ranges) are directly usable by clinicians and municipalities. Future evaluations should assess uptake, adherence, and health outcomes in real-world settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.