ArticleCureus2025
Tubal Stump Ectopic Pregnancy Following Salpingectomy: A Rare Diagnostic Challenge.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A tubal stump ectopic pregnancy is a rare but serious complication following salpingectomy. This case report not only highlights the rarity of this event but also the potential diagnostic challenges involved. A 29-year-old woman with a history of ectopic pregnancy and prior left salpingectomy presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain and bleeding during early pregnancy. She reported bilateral lower abdominal pain, which had progressively worsened over two days. Her pregnancy had been recently confirmed, and her obstetrician-gynecologist (OBGYN) was monitoring her beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) levels. At the time of presentation to the emergency room, her beta-HCG levels had decreased compared to the levels recorded a week earlier. Ultrasound evaluation revealed a right ectopic pregnancy with possible hemoperitoneum. Laparoscopic evaluation subsequently identified the ectopic pregnancy in the left fallopian tube stump. The patient's hemoglobin level at presentation was 7.4 g/dL, necessitating a blood transfusion. The patient underwent successful surgical intervention and was discharged the following day. There is limited literature regarding tubal stump ectopic pregnancies, and no established guidelines exist to address their prevention. One case study has suggested a potential association between tubal stump length and the risk of future tubal stump ectopic pregnancy. Maintaining a high index of suspicion is critical in such cases, especially when clinical symptoms are non-specific and may mimic other gynecologic conditions. The patient's preservation of fertility is a testament to the success of early recognition and surgical intervention in such complex cases. The initial misinterpretation of ultrasound findings suggests the need for advanced imaging techniques to confirm the precise location of rare ectopic pregnancies. Further exploration of this area could help improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.