ArticleCureus2025
The Saudi Population's Preferences: Otolaryngologist vs. Plastic Surgeons for Rhinoplasty.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRhinoplasty is a popular cosmetic surgery worldwide, performed by both otolaryngologists (ENT specialists) and plastic surgeons. In Saudi Arabia, this study aims to explore the population's preferences regarding the two specialties, factors influencing their decisions, and the role of media in shaping these preferences.
objectivesExplore Saudi patients' preferences for otolaryngologists versus plastic surgeons in rhinoplasty, examine perceptions of each specialty's expertise, assess the impact of factors such as cost and experience on decision-making, and identify the sources of information patients use. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study involved 402 participants from Saudi Arabia, aged 18-80 years, selected using simple random sampling. Data were collected through an anonymous self-administered electronic questionnaire distributed via social media platforms. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), with statistical significance set at
resultsThe majority of participants (219, 54.7%) believed ENT surgeons were associated with fewer complications and higher success rates (203, 50.5%) for rhinoplasty. However, 212 (57.2%) respondents preferred plastic surgeons for aesthetic outcomes. The most important decision-making factors were surgeon experience (369, 91.8%), recommendations from medical professionals (312, 77.6%), and cost (221, 55%). Gender and region significantly influenced knowledge scores (
conclusionsPreferences for ENT specialists are primarily driven by functional considerations, whereas plastic surgeons are preferred for aesthetic purposes. Gender, region, and marital status play significant roles in shaping preferences. Media and personal recommendations are critical sources of information. Future studies should examine long-term patient satisfaction and how advancements in cosmetic surgery influence population preferences for rhinoplasty surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.