ArticleClinical case reports2025
Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation After Failed Sacrocolpopexy: A Case Series.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation After Failed Sacrocolpopexy: A Case Series.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrent apical prolapse after failed sacrocolpopexy poses a surgical challenge, with limited evidence on surgical treatments. This case series evaluates the feasibility and 1-year outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) of the residual cervix in this setting. Three postmenopausal women with symptomatic recurrent apical prolapse underwent SSLF after prior laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. At 3- and 12-month follow-up, all patients showed sustained apical support (POP-Q C -8), with significant improvement in symptoms and quality of life (ICIQ-VS scores). Mild, asymptomatic anterior compartment descent was noted in two cases. SSLF of the cervix appears to be a safe, effective, and minimally invasive alternative to redo sacrocolpopexy for selected patients with recurrent apical prolapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.