ArticleACS catalysis2025
Quantifying Site Heterogeneity in Microporous Aluminosilicates and Implications for Catalysis.
Article in ACS catalysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Zeolites and related microporous materials are key acid catalysts for many crucial transformations in both the gas and liquid phases for processes such as hydrocarbon refining, isomerization, and biomass upgrading. However, their catalytic behavior becomes complex under harsh hydrothermal conditions due to the formation of nonframework sites, which can significantly impact reaction rates and selectivity, complicating reproducibility and research evaluations. Therefore, in this work, we set out to establish characterization and titration protocols to identify and quantify site heterogeneity (i.e., differentiate between framework, partially hydrolyzed, and extraframework sites) of steamed microporous aluminosilicates, in contrast to solely using Brønsted and Lewis designations. For this purpose, we employ commercial MFI aluminosilicates (ZSM-5) of differing site heterogeneity and Si/Al ratios to quantify their site distribution through a combination of temperature-programmed desorption and FTIR protocols while contextualizing their effect on propane cracking rate constants. From the conclusions obtained, the present work provides a nuanced titration strategy on how to quantitatively determine the site heterogeneity of aluminosilicates and Al content without catalyst modification and with considerations for physisorbed species, base type, and size. We also reinforce literature observations of how water can induce changes in Al coordination even at ambient conditions, especially with increasing Al content, before catalysis, which adds variability in rate measurements. These observations and approaches should be extendable to other acidic zeolites and present ways to determine the site heterogeneity of materials in their dried state, in an accessible manner, that can serve as a starting point to evaluate structure-performance relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.