ArticleInternational journal of nephrology2025
Updating Predictive Model for Cisplatin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: Incorporating Concomitant Medications and the Standard Supportive Care.
Article in International journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury (C-AKI) is detrimental to adequate cancer treatment. While scoring systems to predict C-AKI are available, they do not account for the impact of concomitant medications. This study aimed to enhance the predictive model by incorporating concomitant medications as a new predictor. Methods: We included data from 1785 patients who received cisplatin at Iwate Medical University Hospital between April 2014 and March 2023. Initially, we assessed the performance of the existing model in our cohort. We then explored additional predictors to improve their discriminatory ability guided by the Akaike information criterion. Candidates for new predictors were concomitant anticancer and supportive care medications that were previously unexamined. Finally, we assessed the statistical usefulness of the updated model using the C-statistic and its clinical usefulness using net reclassification improvement (NRI) and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The discriminatory power of the existing model was poor, with a C-statistics of 0.621 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.582-0.660). Incorporating magnesium supplementation as a novel predictor significantly improved the model's performance, increasing the C-statistic to 0.695 (95% CI: 0.660-0.731). The updated model demonstrated a superior NRI of 0.143 (95% CI: 0.043-0.243). In the DCA, the updated model yielded higher net benefits for most threshold probabilities. Conclusion: The existing model did not demonstrate satisfactory clinical performance in our cohort. While incorporating magnesium supplementation significantly improved model discrimination, its status as standard care limits its utility as a predictive variable. These findings underscore the necessity of developing C-AKI prediction models within cohorts receiving uniform, contemporary supportive care regimens.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.