Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41127571›Full record

ArticleExpert review of ophthalmology2025

Approval of retinal gene therapies in the US and Europe based on visual acuity and microperimetry.

Amandeep Singh Josan, Shabnam Raji, Robert Edward MacLaren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amandeep Singh JosanNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Shabnam RajiNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Robert Edward MacLarenNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR202821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Gene therapy is an emerging technology for the treatment of inherited retinal diseases. Whilst the development of delivery vectors and genotyping is progressing at speed, outcome measures used for regulatory approval are slow to change and hinder progress clinical trial stage. Traditional measures of visual function such as best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and low luminance visual acuity (LLVA) may only be useful across a very short window and in late stages of disease. They are unsuitable measures for early- to mid-stage disease where foveal function, and so letter reading, is primarily unaffected. In such cases, microperimetry is an accurate and repeatable measure of retinal function of the whole of the macular region. Areas covered: This article provides evidence-based guidance on criteria for microperimetry outcome measures, drawing on experience from long-term clinical trials in Expert opinion: Microperimetry provides a sensitive and repeatable measure of retinal function, with mean sensitivity across the macula or central 16-point region offering a more reliable metric than single-point requirements recommended by the FDA. A 2.5dB gain in mean sensitivity is equivalent to a 13-letter increase in low-luminance ETDRS representing a clinically significant change and aligning closely with regulatory standards.

Indexed as

Clinical trialsEMAFDAfundus-controlled perimetryinherited retinal diseaselow luminanceoutcome measuresregulatory

Identifiers

PMID41127571
PMCPMC7618271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.