ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Variability and performance of radiologic stricture parameters in Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a Bayesian network-based surgical risk-prediction tool for patients with small-bowel stricturing Crohn's disease.Gastroenterology report · 2026Article
- Intestinal Ultrasound in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Monitoring Inflammation and Treatment Response.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Phenotype-driven management in ileocecal Crohn's disease: a narrative review with a proposed research framework.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Disease-related strictures are a common complication of Crohn's disease (CD). Cross-sectional imaging is widely used for their assessment, but definitions remain variable and non-standardised. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify commonly used imaging parameters, assess diagnostic performance, and evaluate consistency across studies. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) studies on CD-associated strictures, searching MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane to January 1, 2025. We included prospective and retrospective studies of small-bowel CD strictures with surgical histopathology as reference standard. Summary data were extracted from published reports and pooled using a random-effects bivariate meta-analysis, which jointly models sensitivity and specificity while accounting for between-study heterogeneity. Exclusion criteria were pediatric populations, colonic and upper-GI strictures. Main outcomes were stricture definitions and diagnostic performance. The study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD420251032918. Findings: Of the 9436 articles identified through the search, 30 met eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis, comprising 1866 patients with CD: 5 on US, 7 on CT, 8 on MRI, and the remaining assessed two techniques. Luminal narrowing (LN), bowel wall thickening (BWT), and pre-stenotic dilation (PSD) were the most common descriptors. 4 studies (13%) required all three; the remaining used LN or BWT alone, with PSD often considered optional (20/30 [77%]). Overall, 26.7% (8/30) of studies were judged at high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for US techniques to detect strictures were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.91) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.91) ( Interpretation: High diagnostic accuracy was observed across imaging modalities, with no statistically significant difference among them, and only a minority of studies at risk of bias unlikely to affect these findings. Heterogeneity existed in cut-offs and parameter combinations used to define strictures. PSD does not appear essential for stricture diagnosis, which could simplify diagnostic protocols. Variations in histological criteria and limited evidence for some modalities may limit generalizability. Funding: None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.