Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41127561›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

AI-derived longitudinal and multi-dimensional CT classifier for non-small cell lung cancer to optimize neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy decision: a multicentre retrospective study.

Guanchao Ye, Zhitao Wei, Chu Han, Guangyao Wu, Chinting Wong, Yanting Liang, Xiaobo Chen, Wang Zhou, Jianbo Gao, Changhong Liang and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Guanchao YeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Zhitao WeiSchool of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Chu HanDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Guangyao WuDepartment of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, China.
Chinting WongDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Yanting LiangDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Xiaobo ChenDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Wang ZhouThe First Clinical College of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Jianbo GaoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Changhong LiangDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Yongde LiaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, China.
Lizza E L HendriksDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, 6202 AZ, the Netherlands.
Leonard WeeClinical Data Science, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229 ET, the Netherlands.
Dirk De RuysscherDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School of Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, 6229 ET, the Netherlands.
Andre DekkerClinical Data Science, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229 ET, the Netherlands.
Haiyu ZhouDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Yu QiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Zaiyi LiuDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Zhenwei ShiDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NACI) has significantly improved survival in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, with the currently available methods (PD-L1, RECIST), it is difficult to predict who will benefit from treatment before therapy and who will achieve pathological complete response (pCR) before surgery. Non-invasive methods to predict treatment response to NACI could be used to further personalize treatment. Methods: In the multicenter retrospective study, we enrolled 534 patients with NSCLC who received NACI followed by surgical resection at three Chinese hospitals between January 2019 and December 2024 (193 patients from Center A, 193 patients from Center B, and 148 patients from Center C). We developed and validated Lung Cancer Neo-adjuvant Immuno-Chemotherapy Response Predictor (LC-NICER), a CT-based Artificial Intelligence (AI) system that integrates longitudinal radiomics (tumor texture), deep learning (microenvironmental context), and habitat imaging (tumor and peritumoral subregional dynamics) to predict pCR by analyzing tumor spatiotemporal heterogeneity. The LC-NICER system consists of two complementary predictive models: LC-NICER Findings: Among the 386 patients from Center A and B, 308 were randomly assigned to the training dataset and 78 to the internal validation dataset, following an 8:2 split ratio. The 148 patients from Center C formed an independent and external test dataset. LC-NICER prediction system demonstrated excellent performance with the area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.950 (0.927-0.970) in the training cohort, 0.889 (0.796-0.961) in the internal validation cohort, and 0.870 (0.803-0.927) in the external test cohort. The LC-NICER Interpretation: As a non-invasive AI system for predicting NACI response in NSCLC, LC-NICER may offer future clinical personalized therapeutic strategies, accelerate adaptive clinical trials, and optimize treatment decisions, potentially reducing reliance on invasive procedures. Funding: This work was supported by the Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project (2024ZD0531100, 2024ZD0531101), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82472062, 62102103, 82473298, 82202148, 82502479), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC2508603), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China (2024A1515011672), Regional Innovation and Development Joint Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China (U22A20345), Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis and Application (2022B1212010011).

Indexed as

Deep learningHabitat imagingLongitudinal CTNeoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapyNon-small cell lung cancerRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID41127561
PMCPMC12538916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.