ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Non-contact human identification through radar signals using convolutional neural networks across multiple physiological scenarios.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In recent years, contactless identification methods have gained prominence in enhancing security and user convenience. Radar-based identification is emerging as a promising solution due to its ability to perform non-intrusive, seamless, and hygienic identification without physical contact or reliance on optical sensors. However, being a relatively new technology, research in this domain remains limited. This study investigates the feasibility of secure subject identification using heart dynamics acquired through a continuous wave radar. Unlike previous studies, our work explores identification across multiple physiological scenarios, representing, to the best of our knowledge, the first such exploration. Methods: We propose and compare two identification methods in a controlled Resting scenario: a traditional machine learning pipeline and a deep learning-based approach. The latter consists of using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to extract features from scalograms, followed by a Support Vector Classifier (SVC) for final classification. We further assess the generalizability of the system in multiple scenarios, evaluating performance both when the physiological state is known and when it is not. Results: In the Resting scenario, the deep learning-based method outperformed the traditional pipeline, achieving 97.70% accuracy. When extending the identification task to various physiological scenarios, 82% of predictions exceeded scenario-specific confidence thresholds, achieving 98.6% accuracy within this high-confidence subset. Discussion: Our findings suggest that radar-based identification systems can match the performance of established biometric methods such as electrocardiography (ECG) or photoplethysmography (PPG), while offering the additional benefit of being contactless. This demonstrates the potential of radar heart signal analysis as a reliable and practical solution for secure human identification across diverse conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.