ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Hybrid telerehabilitation approach for patellofemoral pain management in South African runners: a feasibility case series.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a prevalent condition in sports medicine, with rising incidence as sports competitions become increasingly popular. South Africa's healthcare system faces substantial challenges in delivering rehabilitation services due to geographical constraints, limited resources including professional shortages, and inadequate access to specialised musculoskeletal care. This study evaluated the feasibility of implementing a hybrid telerehabilitation program combining face-to-face sessions with WhatsApp video consultations for managing PFP in South African runners. Methods: A feasibility case series was conducted with five runners aged 25-39 years with PFP duration ≥6 weeks, recruited from Johannesburg. The 6-week intervention comprised an initial in-person assessment, weekly WhatsApp video consultations, and bi-weekly face-to-face sessions. Primary feasibility outcomes included recruitment success, session adherence, and acceptability measured using the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). Secondary clinical outcomes assessed pain intensity (Numerical Pain Rating Scale) and functional status (Anterior Knee Pain Scale). Results: Recruitment targets were fully achieved with 100% adherence to all scheduled sessions. Participants demonstrated high exercise compliance and good acceptability scores (mean TUQ 5.9/7), though participants expressed a preference for in-person consultations. Significant clinical improvements were observed, with pain scores decreasing from 3.8 to 0.6 and functional scores improving from 79.6 to 94.0 over six weeks. Conclusion: Hybrid telerehabilitation demonstrated feasibility and preliminary effectiveness for PFP management in South African runners, achieving excellent adherence rates and clinically meaningful improvements in pain and function. This approach shows promise for addressing healthcare delivery challenges in resource-constrained settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.