ArticleAIMS public health2025
Phubbing and phubber behavior: A new perspective in clinical psychological assessment.
Article in AIMS public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychometric Validation of the Greek Versions of the Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP) and the Generic Scale of Being Phubbed (GSBP) Among Nursing Personnel.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The term "Phubbing" has been defined as a behavior in which a person snubs another in a social setting by focusing on their phone instead of having a conversation. Phubbing is a common phenomenon and reduces the quality of social interactions in people, particularly those in adolescence. Objective: We aimed to validate in Italian, the Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP), and Generic Scale of Being Phubbed (GSPB), in order to measure the experiences of phubbing, and being phubbed, through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Methods: We investigated whether the factor structure of GSP and GSBP may be replicated for the Italian sample, through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). For the assessment, we used the Generic Scale of Being Phubbed, the Generic Scale of Phubbing, the Internet Addiction Test, and Brief COPE. Results: We found that four important factors of phubbing are nomophobia, interpersonal conflict, self-isolation, and acknowledgement of problems, and phubbing behavior is predictive of social disconnectedness. Conclusion: The GSP and GSBP instruments can be useful in the clinical setting to identify specific psychological dimensions associated with phubbing, such as nomophobia and social isolation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.