SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Evaluation of the efficacy and treatment-emergent adverse events of deuruxolitinib for moderate to severe alopecia areata: a dose-ranging meta-analysis of 1,372 randomized patients.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence Synthesis Gone Awry: The Perils of Aggregating Ineffective or Unsafe Doses in Alopecia Areata Reviews.Cureus · 2026Article
- JAK Inhibitors for Alopecia Areata: Approved Therapies, Efficacy, and Unanswered Questions.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Alopecia areata (AA) is an immune disease characterized by non-scarring hair loss. With the increasing use of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in immune-related conditions, their potential role in AA treatment is gaining attention. Deuruxolitinib has emerged as a potential treatment for moderate to severe AA. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis that aims to assess the efficacy of deuruxolitinib in moderate to severe AA. Methods: We systematically searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline, and ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant data. Deuruxolitinib vs. placebo was evaluated, and efficacy was measured using severity of alopecia tool (SALT) and Hair Satisfaction Participants Reported Outcome (SPRO), with the primary time point of assessment at week 24. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) such as increased creatinine kinase (CPK), acne, and headache were specifically assessed at week 28. Effect sizes were presented using mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR). Statistical heterogeneity was measured by Results: Three randomized controlled trials involving 1,372 patients were included. Deuruxolitinib demonstrated a significant improvement in SALT score change from baseline [MD = -47.26, 95% CI = (-53.47, -41.05), Discussion: In conclusion, deuruxolitinib shows promising efficacy in treating moderate to severe AA, leading to significant improvements in hair regrowth and patient-reported satisfaction. While certain TEAEs such as increased CPK levels, headaches, and acne (especially at the 12 mg dose), they were generally manageable. Further research and vigilant monitoring for long term safety are necessary before widespread adoption of deuruxolitinib for AA treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.