Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41127378›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Does higher education enhance public perception of the environment: a quasi-natural experiment based on higher education expansion.

Hanjin Xie, Fengquan Wu, Jun Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hanjin XieSchool of Economics and Management, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, China.
Fengquan WuSchool of Economics and Management, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, China.
Jun LiSchool of Public Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is now well acknowledged that environmental challenges threaten public health. As knowledge proliferates, public awareness of environmental issues escalates, along with heightened sensitivity to these concerns. This study seeks to utilize the 1999 'college entrance examination enlargement' policy as a quasi-natural experiment. Utilizing data from the 2020 China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), a perception score was established on a scale of 0-10, and a cohort difference-in-differences model was employed to assess the influence of higher education on public environmental perception. The research indicated that advanced education has enhanced the public's environmental awareness levels. Mechanism studies indicate that higher education enhances environmental awareness by augmenting individuals' scientific literacy through extended years of study, cultivating favorable views toward the internet, and refining internet usage skills. The enhancement of rational thinking skills via higher education constitutes another avenue of influence. The influence of higher education on improving public environmental awareness demonstrates considerable variability across several aspects. The research demonstrates that voluntary and market-incentive-based environmental restrictions have distinct moderating functions in this process. This research clarifies the fundamental mechanisms of enhanced environmental perception among Chinese inhabitants, offering additional insights into the evolution of environmental consciousness and behavior among the Chinese populace. Moreover, it provides significant insights for policy enhancement, educational philosophy, and urban-rural integration.

Indexed as

cohort DIDenvironmental regulationhigher educationperception differencespublic environmental perception

Identifiers

PMID41127378
PMCPMC12537388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.