Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41127377›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025

Translation and interpreting self-efficacy: a review of published measures.

Muhammad M M Abdel Latif, Majed M Alhamad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Muhammad M M Abdel LatifFaculty of Graduate Studies of Education, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Majed M AlhamadDepartment of Studies of Arabic (L2), College of Language Sciences, King Saud University, 11652 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important area of research in translation and interpreting assessment focuses on measuring translators' and interpreters' self-ability beliefs, normally characterized by two main constructs: self-efficacy and self-concept. Self-ability beliefs have a potential relationship with translators' and interpreters' task performance and perseverance. While several self-efficacy measures for translators and interpreters exist, no self-concept scales appear to have been published to date. In this article, we review seven published scales assessing translation and interpreting self-efficacy (four translation and three interpreting measures). In our review, we discuss the extent to which the items of the scales represent the constructs being assessed, as well as the translation or interpreting competences they cover. The review indicated that the seven self-efficacy measures focus on only a limited number of translation and interpreting competences. In addition, their items assess the target competences only partially. A few items related to self-concept were also found in the three reviewed interpreting self-efficacy measures. It is concluded that advancing translation and interpreting self-efficacy measurements requires adopting different orientations. The article highlights the self-efficacy measurement gaps that should be addressed in future translation and interpreting research.

Indexed as

interpreting self-efficacyself-efficacy measurestranslation motivationtranslation self-efficacytranslator training

Identifiers

PMID41127377
PMCPMC12539348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.