ArticleOsteoporosis and sarcopenia2025
Gradient-enhanced neural network and extreme gradient boosting modeling for the prediction of the 3D bone mineral density distribution from 2D-DXA scans.
Article in Osteoporosis and sarcopenia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to predict the volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) distribution from a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan. By employing machine learning, this study bridges the gap between DXA and computed tomography (CT) in terms of volumetric bone assessment, suggesting an approach for a cost-effective and low-radiation alternative for bone health evaluation in a three-dimensional (3D) fashion from a two-dimensional (2D) scan. Methods: Data from 34 participants included aligned DXA and CT scans for the proximal femur. Intensity values were extracted in Hounsfield units, with 3D information mapped as target variables and 2D information as features. Two machine learning models, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) and Gradient-Enhanced Neural Network (GENN), were trained using 5-fold cross-validation strategy and show an average registration accuracy of 0.89 ± 0.04, assessed thorough structural similarity index measure. Results: Both models were built to predict the statistics of the 3D structure of the bone from a 2D image. The GENN model outperformed XGB, achieving mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) of 12.98 ± 1.70%, 13.28 ± 2.01%, and 9.63 ± 1.66% for minimum, maximum, and the number of nonzero pixel intensities, respectively. In contrast, XGB's errors exceeded 16% across these metrics. The loss stabilized within 100 epochs, indicating model robustness and reliability across diverse test sets. Conclusions: The proposed GENN framework offers a method for predicting 3D BMD distributions from a 2D-DXA scan, rivaling CT-based assessments. This approach reduces costs and radiation exposure, presenting a viable solution for personalized bone health evaluation and early osteoporosis diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.