Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41127343›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025

Exploring the experience of patients who receive a telephone follow-up call from intensive care unit nurse specialists following hospital discharge: A descriptive survey.

Sian Ingham, Alasdair Jubb, Monica Trivedi, Milena Georgieva, Catherine Yates, Jill Hyde, Joy McAdam, Robyn Davies, Petra Polgarova, Lisa Enoch and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sian InghamCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Alasdair JubbCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Monica TrivediCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Milena GeorgievaCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Catherine YatesCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Jill HydeCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Joy McAdamCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Robyn DaviesCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Petra PolgarovaCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Lisa EnochCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Olivia BenthamCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Eleanor RuffleCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Joanne McPeakeCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Following hospital discharge from a critical care-related admission, patients can experience multiple problems. There is limited data about how patients can effectively be supported during recovery from critical illness. As such, different services have emerged internationally with the aim of improving outcomes. Objective: The objective was to understand the experience of patients who received a telephone follow-up call from an Intensive Care Unit Recovery Nurse Specialist following a critical care-related hospitalisation. We sought to understand what patients valued about these calls, alongside any improvements which could be made. Methods: Patients from a single centre in the UK, who received a telephone call by the Intensive Care Unit Recovery Nurse Specialist team approximately one month following hospital discharge, were asked to provide feedback on the call via a pre-specified survey. This study employed a descriptive design to report findings from the survey, integrating quantitative and qualitative data to comprehensively explore participant experiences. In this analysis, qualitative feedback was analysed using Framework Analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data. Results: We analysed survey data from 125 patients; this represented a response rate of 28.5%. In total, 98.2% ( Conclusions: This single centre analysis has explored the experience of those receiving a telephone follow-up call from an Intensive Care Unit Recovery Nurse Specialist following critical illness. In the respondents of this evaluation, the call provided reassurance, alongside supporting navigation to appropriate services following hospital discharge. Future research should explore the effectiveness of this intervention, including its impact across diverse groups.

Indexed as

Critical illnessNurse led follow-up and familyRecovery and rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41127343
PMCPMC12538494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.