ArticleBone reports2025
A novel workflow for 3D imaging and spatial analysis of nerves in bone.
Article in Bone reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in bone research.Bone reports · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional visualization of nerves in bones of the human hand in osteoarthritis.JBMR plus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral sensory and sympathetic nerves innervating bony tissues are of interest for their role in modulating bone function and responding to physiologic stimuli. However, due to their filamentous structure and small diameter, peripheral nerves are difficult to visualize and characterize in dense tissues such as bone. Recent advances in imaging have resulted in novel techniques to reconstruct the 3D bone microenvironment following fluorescent staining, using methods such as whole-mount immunostaining, tissue clearing, and lightsheet microscopy (LSM). While these methods have significantly improved visualization of peripheral nerves within the bony skeleton, current practices in skeletal nerve segmentation rely on manual tracing methods that are both subjective and time consuming. Further, due to excess background signal and moderate off-target staining of skeletal nerves, traditional methods for nerve segmentation remain inadequate for effective quantification. Here, we describe a methods-focused workflow for 3D imaging and spatial analysis of nerves in bone that consists of combining LSM with nerve segmentation using the Ilastik® open-source software. First, LSM was used to acquire high-resolution 3D images of nerves in uninjured and injured murine calvaria. Next, we employed Ilastik® to generate accurate segmentations of peripheral nerves in bone. This approach reduced the need for manual segmentation and overcame the limitations of conventional segmentation methods. We then demonstrated the utility of this workflow as a broadly applicable tool, by performing Ilastik®-based segmentation for three distinct skeletal bone contexts (i.e. use cases) with varied bone samples, tissue clearing, processing protocols, inflammatory states, and imaging modalities. Collectively, this workflow enabled the characterization of spatial nerve patterning in bone and has the potential to provide novel insights into spatially regulated phenomena in bone homeostasis, injury, and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.