ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
A novel subtype classification for acute intracranial atherosclerotic disease-related occlusion.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purposed: The optimal endovascular therapy (EVT) strategy for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD)-related occlusion remains uncertain and may be influenced by its underlying pathogenesis. To address this, a novel classification system named Thrombus-Stenosis (TS) has been proposed. Our study aimed to assess the feasibility of the TS classification and its utility in guiding EVT strategy-making. Methods: ICAD was defined as a significant fixed focal stenosis at the site of occlusion evidenced by final angiography or during endovascular treatment. The TS subtype was classified based on presence of the thrombus and stenosis degree of culprit artery with three categories, TS-type I (<70% stenosis with definite thrombus), TS-type II (≥70% stenosis with definite thrombus) and TS-type III (≥70%stenosis without definite thrombus). Four independent raters used the TS classification system to subtype the included cases. Interobserver reliability was assessed using the kappa ( Results: A total of 105 definite ICAD-related occlusion cases were included and successfully classified into the three TS subtypes by the four independent raters, with high interobserver agreement ( Conclusion: The TS classification system is feasible for subtyping ICAD-related occlusions and is closely associated with EVT strategy-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.