SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025
Pharmacological treatment options for cognitive dysfunction induced by multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The locus coeruleus at the crossroads of inflammation and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the effects of various pharmacological treatments on partial test results and adverse effects in patients with cognitive dysfunction (CD) induced by multiple sclerosis (MS) through a network meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically retrieved for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the influence of different pharmacological treatments on CD in MS patients. The search was updated until October 8, 2024. The Risk of Bias tool was used to assess the quality of eligible studies, and R was employed for data analysis. Results: Twenrt six studies involving 23,839 MS patients were included for our analysis. Network meta-analysis results indicated that compared to placebo, L-amphetamine may improve memory in MS-induced CD. Memantine may enhance performance on the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT). Compared to memantine, fampridine-SR, ginkgo biloba, and melatonin showed inferior effects. Atomoxetine may improve Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) scores, outperforming donepezil, ginkgo biloba, L-amphetamine, modafinil, and rivastigmine. Additionally, atomoxetine may improve California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) performance, compared to ginkgo biloba, L-amphetamine, and memantine. In terms of adverse effects, rivastigmine was less likely to cause dyspepsia. Conclusion: Based on current evidence, L-amphetamine may improve memory in MS-induced CD. Melatonin may enhance PASAT performance, and atomoxetine may improve both SDMT and CVLT scores in these patients. However, rivastigmine was found to have a lower likelihood of causing dyspepsia among the treatments assessed. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024623642.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.