Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41127232›Full record

ArticleSultan Qaboos University medical journal2025

Assessing Morbidity and Malignancy Risk in Patients Presenting with Pulmonary Embolism in an Ambulatory Care Setting.

Muhammed Memon, Eram Anwar, Kamran Shakir, Chafik Bouhaddioui, Mueed Akram, Shakeel Awan, Muhammad Khalil, Muhammad Usama, Adnan Agha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sultan Qaboos University medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Muhammed MemonDepartment of Acute Medicine, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Burton-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
Eram AnwarInternal Medicine Department, United Arab Emirates University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0009-0006-9335-9208
Kamran ShakirDepartment of Acute Medicine, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Burton-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
Chafik BouhaddiouiDepartment of Statistics and Business Analytics, United Arab Emirates University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0003-3549-1236
Mueed AkramDepartment of Acute Medicine, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Burton-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
Shakeel AwanDepartment of Acute Medicine, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Burton-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
Muhammad KhalilDepartment of Acute Medicine, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Burton-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
Muhammad UsamaDepartment of Acute Medicine, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Burton-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
Adnan AghaInternal Medicine Department, United Arab Emirates University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-2704-8931

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), especially pulmonary embolism (PE), can be treated in an outpatient setting after appropriate risk assessment. However, front-door physicians may be resistant to follow this practice. The possibility of cancer-associated VTE complicates the outpatient management of PE. This study aimed to assess the morbidity and mortality in patients with PE who were managed in an emergency/acute medicine-led outpatient clinic as per risk stratification as well as detecting diagnoses of new cancer sites (NCSs) in these patients. Methods: This retrospective study included all patients with confirmed PE managed in an acute medicine outpatient setting at Queens Hospital, Burton-on-Trent, United Kingdom, from 2019 to 2022. Biochemical findings, radiological findings, mortality and morbidity rates, treatment administered, simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) scores, complications and NCS diagnosis were obtained. Results: A total of 82 patients were included in this study; their mean age was 63.3 ± 16.7 years and 56.1% (n = 46) were male. The two commonest presenting complaints were new shortness of breath (25.6%, n = 21) and pleuritic chest pain (19.5%, n = 16). Unprovoked PE was observed in 52.4% (n = 43) of patients. Increased sPESI scores were related to increased mortality rates; sPESI scores of 0 and 3 were associated with 0% and 50% mortality rates within 90 days, respectively. NCS was reported in 13.4% (n = 11). Statistical analyses using logistic regression and classification tree methods revealed that NCS can be predicted with 70.6% sensitivity and 97% specificity using 2 variables (history of cancer and age >73 years). Conclusion: The sPESI can help in the risk stratification of patients with PE showing poor outcomes; patients at a high risk of NCS development can be identified using the classification tree method.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareNeoplasmsPulmonary EmbolismAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory Care FacilitiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMorbidityRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsUnited KingdomAmbulatory Clinic FacilityOutpatientPulmonary EmbolismUnited KingdomVenous Thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID41127232
PMCPMC12538929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.