ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Development and evaluation of a risk prediction model for social disability in schizophrenia patients.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Schizophrenia is a severe mental disorder with a significant impact on social functioning. Social disability is common in patients, requiring a reliable prediction model for early intervention. This study aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction model for social disability in schizophrenia patients, focusing on key contributing factors. Methods: A cross-sectional study that involved 473 schizophrenia patients was conducted between February and September 2021. Standardized assessments, including the Social Disability Screening Schedule, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, The Medication Adherence Report Scale, and Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia, were administered. Logistic regression was employed to identify the independent risk factors for social disability, and the model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Results: Among the 473 participants (56.0% male, mean age = 29.31 ± 8.7 years old), 314 (66.4%) had a social disability. Significant differences in educational level, income, residence, and clinical characteristics were observed between the social disability and non-disability groups. The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified six independent risk factors for social disability: severity of psychiatric symptoms, medication adherence, cognitive function, perceived stigma, social support, and psychological capital. The final risk prediction model demonstrated strong discriminatory ability, with an AUC of 0.860 (95% CI: 0.820-0.899). The model exhibited high sensitivity (0.873) and specificity (0.868), with good calibration, as indicated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test ( Conclusions: The risk prediction model can effectively identify schizophrenia patients at high risk for social disability, supporting early and targeted interventions to improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.