ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2025
Institutional readiness to provide critical care to patients with viral hemorrhagic fever (VHF) in the United States after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Erratum: Institutional readiness to provide critical care to patients with viral hemorrhagic fever (VHF) in the United States after the COVID-19 pandemic - CORRIGENDUM.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: A follow-up survey of Special Pathogen Treatment Centers (SPTCs) was conducted to assess their readiness to provide critical care interventions to confirmed and suspected viral hemorrhagic fever (VHF) patients after the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: An electronic survey with 54 multiple-choice and free-response questions assessing VHF critical care capabilities was sent to 74 US SPTCs in April 2023. Results: Fourteen SPTCs (19%) completed the survey. Most respondents were prepared to provide intubation/mechanical ventilation (79%), pharmacologic cardioversion (79%), renal replacement therapy (71%), and defibrillation (71%) to suspected and confirmed VHF patients. Few were ready to provide cricothyrotomy (36%), extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) (29%), or code status (14%). Factors impacting institutions' ability to provide critical care to a VHF patient included staff safety (71%) and clinical futility (50%). Less than half (36%) reported that the COVID-19 pandemic positively affected their facility's ability to care for VHF patients, while 21% indicated the pandemic prompted their facility to be better prepared to care for a VHF patient. Conclusions: Most responding SPTCs reported capability for critical care interventions, although fewer had policies governing code status, ECMO, and cricothyrotomy. Institutions were less prepared to manage a VHF patient after the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting challenges such as staff turnover and less support for training and equipment maintenance. Given that special pathogen outbreaks continue to occur globally, governments and healthcare institutions should institute measures to recruit, support, and retain staff to ensure critical care readiness for special pathogen patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.