ArticleGastro hep advances2026
Shifts in Cohort Eligibility With Deimplementation of Race-specific Guidance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance.
Article in Gastro hep advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Clinical guidance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance for patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) recently removed race from eligibility criteria, and replaced it with country of origin from a HBV-endemic country and PAGE-B score greater than 10. This study sought to determine adherence to prior race-based guidance and how demographic cohort eligibility would shift using new criteria. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with chronic HBV with an outpatient office visit at our institution from June 1, 2022, to June 1, 2023. Patients with a personal history of cirrhosis, HCC, or comorbid viral hepatitis were excluded. HCC surveillance practices were extracted using chart review. PAGE-B scores were calculated utilizing lab data within 3 months of the office visit. Cohort eligibility for screening was compared using criteria from each guidance document. Descriptive and comparative statistics were conducted in Python. Results: Two hundred fifty-nine patients were included (51% Asian, 27% Black, and 12% White). Sixty percent (n = 156) of patients were eligible for surveillance under the race-based guidance, and clinicians adhered to this guidance by ordering surveillance in 94% of eligible cases. Under the new nonrace-based guidance, 63% would be eligible for surveillance, with discordance in surveillance eligibility in 28% of cases. Of patients who would no longer be eligible for HCC surveillance, 97% were Black. Fifty-three percent of patients who would newly warrant surveillance were White, and eligibility was primarily driven by PAGE-B score. Conclusion: Clinicians had been largely adherent to the race-based guidance. New guidance would shift cohort eligibility toward White patients, primarily due to PAGE-B criteria, with 97% of Black patients becoming no longer eligible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.