Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41127127›Full record

ReviewKansas journal of medicine

Hip Internal Rotation in Healthy Baseball Athletes: A Scoping Review.

Nicholas Dombrowski, Austin Gartner, Nick Lowe, Ryan Hoefferle, Vafa Behzadpour

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kansas journal of medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicholas DombrowskiThe University of Kansas School of Medicine-Kansas City, Kansas City, Kansas.
Austin GartnerThe University of Kansas School of Medicine-Kansas City, Kansas City, Kansas.
Nick LoweThe University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Ryan HoefferleThe University of Kansas School of Medicine-Kansas City, Kansas City, Kansas.
Vafa BehzadpourThe University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, Kansas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this scoping review was to evaluate hip internal rotation (IR) range of motion (ROM) across different age groups of baseball athletes to identify those at greater risk of injury. Additional objectives included comparing hip IR ROM between dominant and non-dominant legs and between pitchers and position players. Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, OVID, and CINAHL. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria required studies to be full text, written in English, involve healthy baseball athletes cleared for participation, and include measurements of bilateral passive hip IR ROM prior to any interventions. Data Extraction: Three independent reviewers systematically extracted data on population age, competition level, passive dominant hip IR ROM, and passive non-dominant hip IR ROM. When available, means, standard deviations, and sample sizes also were extracted. Data Synthesis: The initial search yielded 155 studies, of which 23 met inclusion criteria. Aggregate data were analyzed using weighted means, pooled standard deviations, and sample sizes. Athlete groups were categorized as youth (<13 years), high school, college, and professional. College and professional groups were further stratified into pitchers and position players. Conclusions: All groups exhibited deficits in bilateral passive hip IR ROM. Professional athletes demonstrated greater bilateral hip IR compared to college-aged athletes. The difference in mean non-dominant versus dominant hip IR between pitchers and position players was minimal, measuring less than two degrees.

Indexed as

baseballhipprimary preventionrange of motion

Identifiers

PMID41127127
PMCPMC12539768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.