ArticleJournal of extracellular biology2025
Direct Experimental Evidence for Selective Uptake of Function-Specific Small Extracellular Vesicles by Recipient Cells.
Article in Journal of extracellular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exercise-conditioned extracellular vesicles in Alzheimer's disease: a multi-organ signaling network linking peripheral adaptation to brain pathology.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Direct Experimental Evidence for Selective Uptake of Function-Specific Small Extracellular Vesicles by Recipient Cells.Journal of extracellular biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs), ranging from 30 to 200 nm in diameter, are a subset of extracellular vesicles that play an essential role in intercellular communication by transporting bioactive molecules between cells. Due to their diverse cargo and origins, sEVs form a highly heterogeneous population. Previous studies have suggested that recipient cells uptake specific sEVs to ensure accurate signalling, but direct experimental evidence on how cells effectively communicate in such a complex and noisy environment has been lacking. In this study, we provide direct experimental evidence by developing a method to retrieve and analyze internalized sEVs from the intracellular membrane compartments of recipient cells. Using this sEV retrieval method, we isolated sEV subpopulations from two types of breast cancer cells after incubation with sEVs derived from mixed cell cultures. We then assessed their functional roles by evaluating the phenotypic responses of cells treated with these retrieved sEV subpopulations. Our results reveal apparent differences in their functional impacts, indicating that cells employ a function-based mechanism to selectively uptake sEVs. This finding advances our understanding of how cells enhance communication efficiency via sEVs. Further investigation into this phenomenon could offer deeper insights into intercellular communication and its role in health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.