ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2025
Deep learning for Three-Class Classification of ground-glass nodules on non-enhanced chest CT: A multicenter comparative study of CNN architectures.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and internal validation of a high-resolution computed tomography radiomics and three-dimensional deep learning diagnostic prediction model for preoperative differentiation of minimally invasive and invasive adenocarcinoma in subsolid nodules.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- [Advances in the Growth Risk Assessment and Precision Management of Pulmonary Subsolid Nodules].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop, validate, and compare four three-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural network (CNN) models for differentiating ground-glass nodules (GGNs) on non-contrast chest computed tomography (CT) scans, specifically classifying them as adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH)/adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), or invasive adenocarcinoma (IA). Materials and methods: This multi-center study retrospectively enrolled 4284 consecutive patients with surgically resected and pathologically confirmed AAH/AIS, MIA, or IA from four hospitals between January 2015 and December 2023. GGNs were randomly partitioned into a training set (n = 3083, 72 %) and a validation set (n = 1277, 28 %). Four 3D deep learning models (Res2Net 3D, DenseNet3D, ResNet50 3D, Vision Transformer 3D) were implemented for GGN segmentation and three-class classification. Additionally, variants of the Res2Net 3D model were developed by incorporating clinical and CT features: Res2Net 3D_w2 (sex, age), Res2Net 3D_w6 (adding lesion size, location, and smoking history), and Res2Net 3D_w10 (sex, age, location, the mean, maximum, and standard deviation of CT attenuation, nodule volume, volume ratio, volume ratio within the left/right lung, and the maximum CT value of the entire lung). Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, recall, precision, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Res2Net 3D outperformed others, achieving AUCs of 0.91 (AAH/AIS), 0.88 (MIA), and 0.92 (IA). Its F1-scores were 0.416, 0.500, and 0.929, respectively. All Res2Net variants achieved accuracies between 0.83-0.84. Conclusion: The Res2Net 3D model accurately differentiates GGN subtypes using non-contrast CT, showing high performance, especially for invasive adenocarcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.