ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2025
Energy Underreporting in Low-Calorie and Carbohydrate-Restrictive Diets: Epidemiological Considerations.
Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reply to Letter to the Editor regarding Ostojic 2025 - Creatine Intake and Restrictive Diets.Annals of nutrition & metabolism · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inaccurate energy intake assessments and dietary underreporting are important barriers to assess reliable health correlates of food consumption in nutritional epidemiology. Studies that do not account for this phenomenon may result in spurious diet-health associations. Whether underreporting occurs more frequently with special diets remains subject to investigation. Objectives: This study aimed to test the hypothesis whether low-calorie and carbohydrate-restrictive diets were associated with increased odds for energy intake underreporting and investigate whether a lower carbohydrate intake (in %/total energy intake) was associated with a higher discrepancy between self-reported energy intake and total energy expenditure. Methods: This study used a predictive equation derived from 6497 doubly labeled water measurements to detect erroneous self-reported energy intake in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES, 2009-2018). Weighted underreporting prevalence was compared among 3 groups, namely, the United States general population without a special diet, individuals who reported low-calorie diets, and individuals who reported carbohydrate-restrictive diets. Crude and multivariate logistic binomial regression models were built to examine associations between diet and energy intake underreporter status. Results: Data from 18,150 adult NHANES participants ≥20 y were analyzed. Underreporting occurred almost twice as often in participants reporting low-calorie diets [38.84% (CI: 34.87, 42.95)] and carbohydrate-restrictive diets [43.83% (CI: 33.02, 55.26)] as compared with the general population [22.89% (CI: 21.88, 23.93)]. Both diets were associated with significantly higher odds for underreporting even after an adjustment for sociodemographic factors [odds ratio (OR): 2.32; CI: 1.93, 2.79 and OR: 2.86; CI: 1.85, 4.42, respectively]. Subanalyses in participants denying any weight loss intention/with stable weight revealed a comparable picture. The lowest level of agreement between total energy expenditure and self-reported energy intake was found in carbohydrate-restrictive diets. Conclusions: Our findings have far-reaching implications, especially with regard to studies that associated carbohydrate restriction or low-calorie diets with favorable health outcomes while not accounting for the herein-suggested phenomena.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.