Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41127027›Full record

ArticleTheScientificWorldJournal2025

Immediate Postabortion Family Planning Uptake and Its Associated Factors Among Women Seeking Abortion Services at Health Facilities in East Shewa Zone, Ethiopia: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

Mangistu Abera, Mulugeta Animaw, Abdulaziz Assefa, Ayele Sahile Abdo, Aynalem Belay, Fikremariam Endeshaw, Daniel Tsega, Aberash Beyene Derribow

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mangistu AberaDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1942-5162
Mulugeta AnimawDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3304-3245
Abdulaziz AssefaDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.
Ayele Sahile AbdoDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8504-7259
Aynalem BelayDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8231-6564
Fikremariam EndeshawDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.
Daniel TsegaDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.
Aberash Beyene DerribowDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8706-4271

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Immediate postabortion family planning uptake refers to the initiation and use of contraceptive methods immediately after an abortion treatment to prevent subsequent unintended pregnancy. Women should wait at least 6 months after having an abortion before becoming pregnant again, according to WHO recommendations, even if they are eager to have a child immediately. Despite this evidence, many postabortion clients leave healthcare institutions without receiving family planning advice or services. Thus, this study was aimed at assessing the immediate postabortion family planning uptake and associated factors among women seeking abortion services. Method: An institution-based, multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted among 402 women seeking abortion services in East Shewa Zone healthcare facilities from March 20 to May 25, 2022. A systematic sampling technique was employed to get a representative sample. Data were entered into EpiData Version 4.1 and then exported to Statistical Package for Social Science Version 26 for analysis. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were done to identify variables associated with the level of immediate postabortion family planning uptake in the binary logistic regression model. Statistical significance was declared at Result: In this study, the overall immediate postabortion contraceptive uptake was 70.1% (95% CI: 65.4, 74.6). Being single (AOR = 4.0; 95% CI: 1.8, 8.0), educational status (AOR = 3.7; 95% CI: 1.4, 9.7), service received at public facility (AOR = 3.0; 95% CI: 1.5, 6.1), previous information about family planning (AOR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.2, 3.9), previous use of contraceptive method (AOR = 5.4; 95% CI: 2.9, 9.9), and postabortion family planning counseling (AOR = 5.7; 95% CI: 3.1, 10.4) were significantly associated with immediate postabortion family planning uptake. Conclusion and Recommendation: In this study, 29.9% lacked postabortion family planning uptake. Being single, educational status, service received at a public facility, previous information about family planning, previous use of a contraceptive method, and postabortion family planning counseling showed significant associations with immediate postabortion contraceptive uptake. Therefore, it is necessary to establish effective educational awareness and counseling aimed at promoting postabortion modern family planning uptake among the abortion service-seeking women.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedContraception BehaviorFamily Planning ServicesHealth FacilitiesAdolescentAdultContraceptionCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansPregnancyYoung Adultcontraceptive methodEthiopiafamily planningPAFP uptakepostabortion

Identifiers

PMID41127027
PMCPMC12539988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.