ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Machine learning insights into vaccine adjuvants and immune outcomes.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-driven big data analysis and predictive modeling of infectious disease immunity: from correlates to causal, multiscale understanding.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Bacterial secondary metabolites as resistance-modifying adjuvants: microbial origins, molecular mechanisms, and translational relevance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Pathogenic mechanisms and vaccine development forFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adjuvants boost the immune response to vaccine antigens, serving as key components in safe and effective vaccines. However, selecting a suitable adjuvant for a new vaccine can be challenging. This is due to the wide variety of adjuvants and the many mechanisms of vaccines they are meant to enhance. Therefore, the adjuvant selection process heavily relies on empirical experiments, which are time-consuming and resource-intensive. In this study, we introduce a machine learning approach leveraging non-human primate RNA transcriptomic data to predict immunogenic antibody levels after vaccination. Furthermore, analysis of the trained deep learning models enabled the identification of immune response mechanisms that are stimulated by adjuvants. Integration of machine learning has the potential to expedite vaccine adjuvant selection by focusing on evaluating adjuvant candidates with the highest probability of success. This may ultimately facilitate the development of more effective vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.