ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Examining the Effectiveness of Automated Acoustic Recording Units for Recording Predator-Related Disturbances in Colony Nesting Birds: A Case Study.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As habitat destruction and human expansion pushes wildlife to ever shrinking habitats, new methods are needed to monitor and assess the impacts of disturbances on ecosystems. Automated recording units (ARUs) may provide a cost effective and minimally invasive way of monitoring disturbances and behavioral responses under these changing conditions. ARUs are gaining prominence in avian research, replacing in-person observers in various surveys and in tracking the movement of individual birds. Researchers have investigated the reliability of ARUs in these studies, but investigations into their reliability in detecting behavioral events are lacking. The main objective of this case study is to investigate if disturbance data from predation events in Ardea herodias fannini (heron) colonies can adequately be obtained from bioacoustics recordings and used in research to substitute for in-person observations. ARUs were placed at two heron colonies and accompanied by in-person observers. Both sources recorded minor or major predatory disturbances to the colonies with minor disturbances being a single heron responding and major disturbances being multiple herons responding. The records of detected disturbances from each observation method were compared. We found that ARUs were able to distinguish major disturbances from other calls. There was no considerable difference between major disturbances detected by ARUs or by in-person observers. However, the ARUs did have marginally less success when trying to detect minor disturbances. This was attributed to ARUs providing purely auditory cues as opposed to some visual cues that human observers occasionally rely on. When monitoring remote colony nesters with distinct auditory calls, ARUs can provide a cost effective and scalable substitute for in-person observers. These data can be easily repurposed for other research questions, stored for long-term studies to find gradual changes in behavior, or used to study unexpected or rapid changes to an environmental variable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.