ArticleClinical endoscopy2026
Assessment of colorectal polyp detection along the short-axis direction of the intestinal lumen during colonoscopic observation: a retrospective study in Japan.
Article in Clinical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal polyp detection during colonoscopy is influenced by the lesion location, size, morphology, and histology. However, no studies have systematically assessed the difficulty of detection along the short axis of the intestinal lumen. This study aimed to evaluate the colorectal polyp detection rates on this axis during colonoscopy.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 1,169 polyps in 513 patients who underwent colonoscopy at Showa University Hospital between November 2022 and February 2023. The short-axis lumen was divided into: upper right, lower right, lower left, and upper left. Each polyp detected was assigned to a quadrant. Detection rates were compared across quadrants and analyzed for associations with clinicopathological factors including lesion size, location, macroscopic type, and examiner experience.
resultsThe lesion detection rates varied significantly by quadrant. The upper left quadrant had the lowest detection rate (17.5%) compared with the expected 25.0% per quadrant. Subgroup analyses consistently confirmed the lower detection rates in this quadrant across most lesion types and patient groups, except for lesions in the cecum and rectum.
conclusionsThe lower detection rate in the upper left quadrant suggests that this orientation poses a challenge and may increase the number of missed lesions. Enhanced examination of this area may improve detection; however, further prospective studies are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.