ReviewPhysiological reports2025
Algorithm for transient response of human open-circuit whole-room indirect calorimetry: A review and future perspective.
Review in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuromechanical synergy patterns explain metabolic efficiency differences during the sit-to-walk transition.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Algorithm for transient response of human open-circuit whole-room indirect calorimetry: A review and future perspective.Physiological reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Open-circuit whole-room indirect calorimetry is a reliable method for assessing cumulative energy expenditure and substrate oxidation over a prolonged period without disrupting normal activities such as eating and sleeping. Over the past three decades, efforts to improve the time resolution of indirect calorimetry have increased, aiming to synchronize energy metabolism with rapidly changing behaviors and physiologic signals. As such, various new algorithms have been proposed: trend identification, total variation denoising, wavelet de-noising, Kalman estimation, and deconvolution with a regularization parameter. The ability to estimate the time course of energy metabolism differs among algorithms. In this review on the methodology of open-circuit whole-room indirect calorimetry, we discuss similarities and critical differences in the theoretical background of various algorithms and compare their performance in simulations. In terms of correlation with the true value and mean squared errors, deconvolution with a regularization parameter outperformed the other algorithms. As further improvements in the algorithmic approaches are expected, we propose a practical guideline to support ongoing development: newly developed algorithms should be benchmarked against existing algorithms, and the source code should be made publicly available to facilitate transparent evaluation and future comparisons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.