Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41126542›Full record

ReviewPhysiological reports2025

Algorithm for transient response of human open-circuit whole-room indirect calorimetry: A review and future perspective.

Insung Park, Hitomi Ogata, Kumpei Tokuyama

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Insung ParkInstitute of Global Well-being Science, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Hitomi OgataGraduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hirosaki, Japan.
Kumpei TokuyamaInternational Institute for Integrative Sleep Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1756-4227

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open-circuit whole-room indirect calorimetry is a reliable method for assessing cumulative energy expenditure and substrate oxidation over a prolonged period without disrupting normal activities such as eating and sleeping. Over the past three decades, efforts to improve the time resolution of indirect calorimetry have increased, aiming to synchronize energy metabolism with rapidly changing behaviors and physiologic signals. As such, various new algorithms have been proposed: trend identification, total variation denoising, wavelet de-noising, Kalman estimation, and deconvolution with a regularization parameter. The ability to estimate the time course of energy metabolism differs among algorithms. In this review on the methodology of open-circuit whole-room indirect calorimetry, we discuss similarities and critical differences in the theoretical background of various algorithms and compare their performance in simulations. In terms of correlation with the true value and mean squared errors, deconvolution with a regularization parameter outperformed the other algorithms. As further improvements in the algorithmic approaches are expected, we propose a practical guideline to support ongoing development: newly developed algorithms should be benchmarked against existing algorithms, and the source code should be made publicly available to facilitate transparent evaluation and future comparisons.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCalorimetry, IndirectEnergy MetabolismHumansdeconvolutiontime resolutionwhole‐room indirect calorimetry

Identifiers

PMID41126542
PMCPMC12546675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.