ArticleBMC psychology2025
Predicting 3-year depressive symptoms among middle-aged and older adults in rural China using random forest: insights from the China health and retirement longitudinal study.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary diversity trajectories and depression symptoms among rural older adults: a latent class growth analysis and network analysis based on the China longitudinal health and longevity study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning model for post-PCI exercise intolerance in patients with coronary artery disease via electronic medical records.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnder China’s dual economic structure of urban and rural areas, rural regions face issues such as low socioeconomic status, inadequate healthcare resources, and neglect of mental health, leading to a higher prevalence of depression among middle-aged and older adults (above 45 years) in this area.
methodsThis prospective cohort study used data from 6,183 rural Chinese middle-aged and older adults in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS, 2018–2020). A random forest model was developed to predict 3-year incidents of depressive symptoms. Independent risk factors were identified via chi-square tests followed by binary logistic regression (Odds Ratios [ORs] and 95% Confidence Intervals [CIs] reported for significant variables, p < 0.05). The model’s performance and clinical utility were assessed using standard metrics and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values determine the individual feature impact on predictions. A subgroup analysis also compared depression-related characteristics in middle-aged (45–59 years) versus older adults (≥ 60 years) with incident depressive symptoms.
resultsOver a 3-year follow-up, 1,629 (26.35%) participants developed incident depressive symptoms. A Random Forest model, optimized using Recursive Feature Elimination (RF-RFE), which selected 28 key predictors from an initial 33. After threshold adjustment (optimal threshold = 0.43) to maximize the F1-score, the model achieved an accuracy of 0.736, precision of 0.499, recall of 0.607, F1-score of 0.548, and an AUC of 0.776 (95% CI: 0.763–0.788). The mean Brier score was 0.163 ± 0.006. DCA confirmed its clinical utility. Key protective factors identified via logistic regression included being male, higher education, and internet access. Conversely, increased age, poor self-rated health, lower life satisfaction, and functional limitations were significant risk factors for incident depressive symptoms.
conclusionThe random forest model demonstrates moderate predictive ability to estimate the risk of depressive symptoms in individuals aged 45 and above in rural China over the next 3 years. It offers a potentially valuable screening tool for rural regions with low mental health awareness and high depression prevalence, enabling more targeted interventions and prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.