ArticleTrials2025
Addressing the knowledge gap: development of stakeholder-informed training to improve the inclusion of adults with impaired capacity to consent in trials.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImproving the inclusion of under-served groups in clinical trials is increasingly being seen as a priority area for research funders and regulators. Adults who lack capacity to make an informed decision about taking part in trials are recognised as an under-served group. Researchers struggle to navigate the complex ethical, legal, and methodological issues surrounding trials involving adults lacking capacity to consent, leading to frequent exclusion of this population. Researchers have identified a need for greater knowledge about designing and conducting trials involving this population. Building on the CONSULT research programme, we developed stakeholder-informed training to help researchers design more inclusive trials.
methodsThe CONSULT e-learning was developed in collaboration with a group of researchers with topic expertise and a lay advisory group with lived experience. It was developed over four phases: (1) establishing researchers' training needs using an online survey; (2) developing the e-learning content including illustrative case studies, videos, and links to resources and further reading; (3) iterative piloting and refining of the content; (4) dissemination of the e-learning and initial evaluation. A set of informational materials about the e-learning were also developed.
resultsInformed by the stakeholder survey (n = 82), the CONSULT e-learning consists of four key modules covering the legal and ethical frameworks, consent and consultation processes, and methodological considerations, with the key role of public involvement threaded throughout. It was launched at a webinar (December 2024), with a post-webinar survey (n = 29) showing an increase in awareness about the importance of including adults lacking capacity in trials where they are a relevant population. Researchers also signalled their commitment to changing their research practice, suggesting that the e-learning has a role in facilitating greater inclusion of this under-served population in trials. The CONSULT e-learning is available online: www.capacityconsentresearch.com/training .
conclusionsAlongside tools such as the INCLUDE Impaired Capacity to Consent Framework, the CONSULT e-learning course aims to support researchers to develop the knowledge and skills needed to design and conduct higher-quality trials that are more inclusive of adults who lack capacity to consent. Further engagement, including with funders who increasingly require inclusion as a condition of funding, is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.