ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025
Evaluation of the performance of telephone triage service.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a growing need to assess the impact of the Medical Helpline (MH) 116117 on emergency care services and patient pathways. This study aims to test a validated performance measurement (PM) framework in a real-life setting and evaluate how MH influences ED service utilization and patient pathways in acute care settings.
methodsWe tested the PM framework to evaluate the Finnish MH service. A quantitative before-and-after analysis was conducted using data from Vantaa for two periods: January 1 to December 31, 2016 ("Before Period") and January 1 to December 31, 2021 ("After Period"). Patient pathways were mapped by linking MH call logs and electronic health records (EHR). Data analysis included compliance and non-compliance rates for triage instructions, accessibility metrics, ED referral patterns, and cost-per-call calculations. Costs were categorized into fixed and variable components, and triage levels, diagnoses, and follow-up care outcomes were evaluated within the PM framework. The dataset included information from 146,858 patients who sought ED services during the study periods.
resultsThe framework provides a valuable tool for continuously measuring and improving MH performance. However, its usability highlights typical PM challenges, including data availability issues and indicator complexity. Broader validation and further development are necessary for systematic implementation. Future efforts should improve data collection processes to support more comprehensive evaluations and address identified gaps. Nevertheless, successful PM requires more than just a feasible measurement tool -it demands developing expertise in PM, refining processes, and understanding how these changes impact patient outcomes. Using a framework, PM demonstrates that the MH effectively manages high call volumes and provides timely support, particularly outside regular office hours. While patient satisfaction is generally high, advancing expertise in PM and refining processes are crucial to better understanding and enhancing patient outcomes. These efforts will further improve the quality and efficiency of MH services.
conclusionsThis study addresses a critical gap in evidence-based support for assessing MH performance-an essential foundation for defining current and future care standards. The proposed framework offers actionable insights to support cost control and improve the quality of care delivery. Findings underscore the value of comprehensive monitoring across performance domains to enhance service effectiveness. Nonetheless, further refinement of the framework is necessary to more accurately capture patient outcomes and assess the real-world impact of these services. Going forward, incorporating patients' perspectives and focusing on outcomes that are meaningful to them will be equally important. Establishing standardised performance metrics is crucial for enabling valid comparisons across different service providers.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.