Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41126255›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025

Functional motor mapping of domestic pig lumbar spinal cord using penetrating microelectrodes.

Soroush Mirkiani, Amirali Toossi, Amin Arefadib, Carly O'Sullivan, Dirk G Everaert, Peter Seres, David Hu, Richard Uwiera, Kevin Robinson, Peter Konrad and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Soroush MirkianiNeuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Amirali ToossiNeuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Amin ArefadibNeuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Carly O'SullivanNeuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Dirk G EveraertInstitute for Smart Augmentative and Restorative Technologies and Health Innovations (iSMART), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Peter SeresInstitute for Smart Augmentative and Restorative Technologies and Health Innovations (iSMART), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
David HuInstitute for Smart Augmentative and Restorative Technologies and Health Innovations (iSMART), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Richard UwieraInstitute for Smart Augmentative and Restorative Technologies and Health Innovations (iSMART), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Kevin RobinsonSchool of Physical Therapy, Belmont University, Nashville, USA.
Peter KonradDepartment of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA.
Vivian K MushahwarNeuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. Vivian.Mushahwar@ualberta.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The restoration of standing and walking after spinal cord injury (SCI) remains a top priority for individuals with paraplegia. Despite significant advancements in neuromodulation techniques, challenges such as limited selectivity and inconsistent outcomes highlight the need for innovative approaches. Intraspinal microstimulation (ISMS) has emerged as a promising method for restoring motor function as demonstrated in various preclinical models. This study aimed to investigate the functional neural networks within the ventral lumbar spinal cord of pigs. We explored 134 stimulation sites inside the spinal cord in 13 domestic pigs. Post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed the location of microelectrode tips inside the spinal cord. The recorded kinematics and electromyographical muscle activity associated with each microelectrode allowed the creation of a functional map of the neural networks activated with ISMS. In addition, we performed anatomical measurements of the lumbar spine and spinal column. Our results revealed a somatotopic organization of motor networks responsible for distinct movements and muscle activations. Differences in activation patterns were primarily observed along the rostrocaudal axis (P < 0.05), where specific stimulation sites were associated with unique movements and muscle responses. In contrast, no notable variations were seen along the mediolateral or dorsoventral directions. Knee extension (KE) was the most frequently observed movement, occurring in 78% of the stimulated sites in the lumbar enlargement, followed by extensor synergy (Ext Syn, 64%), hip flexion (HF, 50%), ankle flexion (AF, 50%), ankle extension (AE, 43%), and hip extension (HE, 43%). Stimulation along the rostrocaudal axis of the lumbar spinal cord elicited a sequence of movements, beginning with HF in the rostral region and transitioning to KE, AF, AE, and HE in the caudal region across animals. Stimulation in the rostral lumbar enlargement produced stronger normalized EMG signals exceeding 50% of the maximum in vastus lateralis (VL) compared to tibialis anterior (TA) gastrocnemius (GS), gluteus medius (GL), and biceps femoris (BF; P < 0.05). Co-activation, defined as simultaneous activity above 50% of normalized maximum EMG activity, occurred at 27.4% of stimulation sites, resulting in synergistic movements and joint stiffening. The resulting map of spinal cord motor networks is important for improving device design and the efficiency of neuroprosthetic interventions. While motor maps exist for other species, they are absent for domestic pigs, a critical model for preclinical testing of SCI treatments. The functional motor maps provided here serve as a foundation for designing and optimizing intraspinal interventions, advancing their translation to clinical application.

Indexed as

Spinal CordAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaElectromyographyLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMicroelectrodesMuscle, SkeletalSpinal Cord InjuriesSus scrofaSwineAnatomicalFunctionalIntraspinal microstimulationMappingPorcine modelSpinal cord

Identifiers

PMID41126255
PMCPMC12542385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.