ArticleGenome biology2025
Propensity for proto-gene emergence in bacteria.
Article in Genome biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification and Classification of Expressed Orphan Genes, Spurious Orphan Genes, and Conserved Genes in the Human Gut Microbiome.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Imported, not invented, genes prevail amongProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Propensity for proto-gene emergence in bacteria.Genome biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe birth of new genes from non-coding sequences has been postulated to be preceded by a proto-gene phase, in which a sequence is translated into protein but does not exhibit hallmarks of a clear function. Despite the abundance of such proto-genes in bacterial genomes, the frequency of their emergence and whether they actually act as precursors of new genes in natural populations are still open questions.
resultsTo address these issues, we applied a combination of transcriptomic, proteomic, and comparative genomic approaches to identify and analyze hundreds of novel bacterial protein-coding genes that have previously escaped annotation. These novel proteins, including many that are widely conserved across genera, display sequence properties indistinguishable from the non-coding regions of the genome, suggesting that the vast majority are evolving neutrally. Despite their abundance and high degree of taxonomic restriction, we were only able to rigorously establish the de novo emergence of one proto-gene within the history of Escherichia coli, highlighting the difficulty of detecting this mode of gene birth in bacterial genomes. Contrary to expectations, we discover that proto-genes emerge at a uniform rate across distant bacterial taxa despite significant differences in their genomic characteristics, suggesting the presence of taxon-specific mechanisms that regulate their origination and persistence.
conclusionsOverall, our findings indicate that proto-genes regularly emerge in bacterial populations but that their sequence properties furnish little evidence that they serve as precursors to new genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.