ArticleBMC medical education2025
Maternity care professionals' views on good counselling for prenatal anomaly screening: a qualitative inquiry.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMaternity care professionals find the art of counselling for prenatal screening challenging. An approach that could help professionals support patients' self-regulated behavior, enabling them to make their own choices, is autonomy-supportive counselling, which is based on the self-determination theory. This study aimed to gain insight into professionals' views on good counselling. Understanding their perspectives can shed light on the underlying mechanisms that drive professionals to focus on providing information and options rather than on decision-making support. These insights, in turn, can be instrumental in tailoring education.
methodsThis qualitative survey study was conducted in the Netherlands among Dutch maternity care professionals involved in counselling for prenatal screening. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the answers to the open-ended question: In your opinion, what constitutes 'good' counselling for prenatal anomaly screening? Next, the research team discussed the identified themes and related these themes to the concept of autonomy-supportive counselling. Lastly, the researchers conducted a quantitative analysis of the qualitative data to draw attention to specific patterns.
resultsOf 2813 invited registered counsellors, 1426 were included in the study. The themes regarding the context of good counselling were time, counsellors' competence, and ethical sensitivity. Exploring the parents' values was found to be an overarching theme in the interaction between patients and professionals during the process of good counselling. Almost all participants mentioned providing information and facilitating free choice as essential themes in the interaction before and during decision-making. Other identified themes were exploring the impact of the test result on the parents and guiding. Regarding the outcome, the most frequently mentioned theme was parents making their own choices, other themes were making the right choice and no assurance of getting a healthy baby.
conclusionsMost participants consider that in good counselling, important themes are providing information as a mechanism, and parents making their own free choices as an outcome. The results and discourse reflect a more non-directive attitude before and during the decision-making process. Since a non-directive attitude can complicate parents' more autonomous decision-making, we suggest paying attention to more directive guidance by providing structure to facilitate parents' more autonomous decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.