ReviewItalian journal of pediatrics2025
Thermal water inhalation for allergic rhinitis and recurrent respiratory infections: a narrative review of the evidence.
Review in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical and Mechanistic Evidence for Comano Thermal Water: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allergic rhinitis (AR) and recurrent respiratory infections (RRIs) are common conditions that significantly impact quality of life and healthcare systems. Thermal water inhalation therapies have emerged as a potential non-pharmacological option due to their immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties. This narrative review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thermal water inhalations in managing patients with AR and RRIs. The inclusion criteria were pertinent articles written in English and published in journals listed in PubMed. Six studies conducted in Italy, involving 548 participants (most of whom were children and adolescents), met the inclusion criteria. Significant improvements were observed in nasal mucociliary transport time, with reductions ranging from 2 to 8 min across treatment groups. Total Symptom Scores decreased significantly (one study reported a > 50% reduction). The frequency and duration of upper respiratory tract infections were reduced considerably in the treatment groups compared to the controls. However, results for nasal cytology were inconsistent, and heterogeneity in study designs limited comparability. The reviewed studies highlighted the potential of thermal water therapies to enhance mucociliary clearance, alleviate symptoms, and reduce reliance on other pharmacological treatments. On the other hand, these studies have a regional limitation and this review was not systematic. In conclusion, this narrative review may suggest that thermal water inhalations could be a promising option for managing patients with AR and RRIs, providing an alternative therapy with significant clinical benefits. Nevertheless, further high-quality, standardized, and international studies are necessary to confirm these findings and facilitate meta-analyses. These treatments could play a valuable role in reducing the burden of respiratory and allergic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.